The United Nations:
False Solution for World Peace
by Cornelia R. Ferreira
- Address given at the “Fatima: Last Chance for World Peace” Conference
in Tuy, Spain on October 12, 2006.
- Your Excellencies, Reverend Fathers and Religious, ladies and gentlemen:
In his address to the United Nations upon its 20th anniversary in 1965, Pope Paul VI said:
- “Our message is meant to be, first of all, a moral and solemn ratification
of this lofty institution. ... this Organization represents the obligatory
path of modern civilization and of world peace. ... The peoples of
the earth turn to the United Nations as the last hope of concord and peace.”
After sixty years the UN has produced no peace. Can it be, therefore, our only hope for peace? Unfortunately, the popes since its inception have increasingly thought so.
As Father Brian Harrison explained in Christian Order, this dependence actually began on November 11, 1918, the day on which the Armistice after World War I was signed, and Emperor Charles I of Austria-Hungary was forced to withdraw from power. He said the people had taken over, and there was going to be a German-Austrian alliance, which he hoped would “create and strengthen the new order.”1
Now, according to the history books, the Holy Roman Empire was destroyed by Napoleon, a Freemason,2 in 1806. But, said Father Harrison,
- “the Church continued to recognize the Austrian Emperor
as ‘inheriting’ the privileges of the Holy Roman Emperor.
..., [just like] Russia has been accepted by the United Nations
as “inheriting” the seat of the extinct Soviet Union.”
Hence, on November 11, 1918, the Holy Roman Empire was finally dissolved as a result of World War I. The Church lost its secular “right arm,” as the Empire was termed in Church prayers. Its job had been to secure peace for the Church and hence for the world. In its place was substituted the humanistic New World Order through the League of Nations, and later through the United Nations, “the new international ‘empire’ based on the rights of man instead of the sovereignty of Christ.”
So important was the politico-religious role of the Emperor in the defense and temporal welfare of Christendom that he was allowed to veto a papal candidate. The Emperor was also prayed for in the Church’s official worship. “In Missals prior to the time of Pius XII, … there is found a Collect, Secret and Post-communion prayer … for the Emperor on appropriate occasions.” He was also included in the great litany of intercessions on Good Friday.3 This was done until the 1950s, probably because it was believed that the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire in 1918 was only a temporary setback. Indeed, Pius tried — unsuccessfully — to set up a new Catholic State after World War II.4
Studying the prayers, one is struck by the fact that whereas formerly the Church called on God for help, now she counts almost exclusively upon evil men and organizations.
The Collect of the Mass called God — not the UN — the protector of all kingdoms and “especially” the Christian Empire. The Secret “reminds us of the Emperor’s duty to guard the peace and liberty of Christendom as the powerful ‘arm’ of the Most High.” It asked God to help His “arm” to “protect the faithful nations; so that when the enemies of peace are defeated, Christian liberty may serve [God] in safety.”
The Post-communion prayer asked God to furnish the Roman Empire and the Emperor with “the armory of heaven” — not the UN — “so that the peace of the churches may remain undisturbed by the storms of war.” The Good Friday intercession asked God to help the Emperor to civilize the world for the sake of “our perpetual peace” by bringing “all barbarous nations” under his authority. It also requested that “those nations which trust in their ferocity may be restrained by the right arm of Thy power”.
God knew the Church would lose her temporal defender in 1918, which is probably why Our Lady of Fatima was sent in 1917 to tell the Church how to protect herself and obtain peace for the world. Quite simply, peace was entrusted to the Immaculate Heart of Mary — nothing and nobody else. War, She said, is caused by sin. Peace will result only when Her Immaculate Heart is venerated worldwide. This requires the Magisterial Consecration of Russia and the Communion of Reparation on the First Saturdays. Otherwise Russia will be an instrument of chastisement worldwide, spreading her errors, fomenting wars and persecutions of the Church.5 But, Our Lady has been ignored. Instead, once the secular right arm of the Church disbanded, Father Harrison notes, “secular substitutes such as the League of Nations and the United Nations” were finally able “to persuade the papacy that they and not the old Christian Commonwealth ... hold the key to world peace and unity.”
So Pope Pius XII dropped the prayers for the Emperor. Then in Paul VI’s new Mass, the prayers after Mass for protection, including the prayer to St. Michael, were dropped. The Church was now firmly committed to depending on God’s enemy, the UN, to protect both her and world peace.
Although Pius XII supported the UN, he warned about it imposing its world outlook on all mankind;6 he thus did not ratify it as the obligatory means to a peaceful world. John XXIII greatly increased Catholic support.7 John Paul I, in his first papal discourse, urged the world to work for a “new order” of “greater justice and more stable peace,” and praised all the peace initiatives, but said “the tremendous spiritual power” of the Catholic Church “is the guarantee of peace and order.”8
Under Pope John Paul II, the Vatican paralleled the UN in many initiatives for universal brotherhood and peace. In 2003, John Paul said the UN “has a more important role than ever in the reconstruction of countries.” He stressed that international law — not God’s law or Our Lady of Fatima’s peace plan, but international law — is a means to avoid war.9 On January 1, 2004, he made it clear that international law, also called “the rule of law,” supersedes the sovereignty of nations. He called for a new international order under a strengthened UN, which he wanted to go from being an administrative institution to a “moral center” for the world!10 We’re talking about an organization that even on the most superficial level is run by thugs and tyrants!
But to understand why the Church’s hope for world peace is terribly misplaced, we must study the history of the UN. The trail leads back to Illuminist Freemasonry, whose ultimate goal has always been to impose the worship of Lucifer through a one-world government. It’s the continuation of Lucifer’s revolt and his desire to rule the entire universe.11 Pope Leo XIII’s 1884 encyclical Humanum Genus details Masonry’s plans for its new world order, meant to replace the old Christian world order. Benjamin Disraeli, Cardinal Newman and Cardinal Manning, in the 19th Century, testified to the power of secret societies behind governments and behind Communism. These secret forces and Communism were directed by Freemasonry, notes Pope Leo. By 1902, he observed, Masonry had “found its way into every class of society,” forming “an invisible and irresponsible power, an independent government, as it were within the ... state.”12
Now, Voltaire wrote that, “in order to lead the masses into new subjection, the Illuminati must lie to them like the devil himself … boldly and always.” He told his fellow Illuminists, “We must make them lavish promises and use extravagant phrases … The opposite of what we promise may be done afterwards … that is of no consequence.”13 This command, in today’s jargon, is the “mission statement” of the United Nations.
Man’s own plan for peace is actually a plan for continuous war, in order to manipulate the world into accepting the surrender of national governments to a world authority. It predates Our Lady of Fatima’s peace plan by about a century. It was designed by Johann Fichte (1762-1814), a German Mason with Illuminati connections. Fichte called for a league of nations as the necessary step preceding world government, “but it would come to fruition after enough wars had been deliberately manipulated to cause humanity to want peace at any price.”14 The United Nations was founded according to Fichte’s plan: unending wars until all of humanity, including the Catholic Church, accepts the rule of the one-world Masonic government.
Russia was the starting point. Churchill revealed that Lenin was sent into Czarist Russia to destroy it. With the help of “the most formidable sect in the world” he worked with “demoniacal ability to tear to pieces every institution on which the Russian State depended.”15 Lenin and other Communist leaders were Satanists.16 This is very significant when we consider the number of Communist countries in the UN. It’s probably safe to say that Our Lady of Fatima was not concerned about the economic policies of Russia but about its spreading the reign of Satan.
The two world wars didn’t just happen. Johann Fichte influenced Hegel, who devised the dialectical method that engenders a conflict between a thesis and its antithesis. The solution is a compromise synthesis of the opposing forces that advances the goal of world government. These steps are repeated until the goal is reached.17 Following the dialectical method, at the end of the 19th Century, Albert Pike, Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, together with the Italian Illuminati leader Mazzini, planned three world wars and a final cataclysm to be deliberately perpetrated by the Illuminati in order to facilitate world government under the guise of promoting peace.18
Hegel influenced both Marx and Hitler.19 The Illuminati funded Karl Marx, whose real name was Mordecai Mark Levi, to write the Communist Manifesto, which promotes Illuminati principles.20 The Illuminati was to “control Communism, Naziism and political Zionism in order to facilitate dividing the world’s population into opposing camps in ever increasing numbers” so that they would eliminate each other. World War I was meant to advance Communism and destroy Czarist Russia. World War II was to be a clash between Communism and its antithesis, Fascism. The third world war is meant to “pit [Zionism] against the Muslim world.” In a final fourth step, a terrible conflict between the remaining Communists and Christians will so exhaust them that their only hope for peace will be to accept a one-world government. The Illuminati will usurp the powers of that government, crown their own leader as king-despot of the world, and impose their Luciferian ideology upon the remaining part of the human race.21
Using Hegel’s dialectical method, the Bolshevik Revolution, the building of the Soviet empire, as well as Hitler and the Nazis, were all financed by European and American bankers who were associated with a secret society with Illuminati connections, known as the Order, or the Order of Skull & Bones.22 Major families associated with the Order include the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and many others of America’s elite, including the Bushes — President Bush, his father, the former President Bush, and his grandfather, who was a partner and director of banking firms that financed Hitler and the Soviets.23 Through the Order, Illuminist thinking has penetrated every segment of society, including religion. The Order gave birth to the League of Nations after World War I, which became the United Nations after World War II.24
The Emerging World Government
Interestingly, Britain issued a “Victory” postage stamp in 1946 that featured Masonic symbols, thus proclaiming World War II a victory for Freemasonry. Regarding the 1991 Gulf War, President Bush, Sr., said, “… for the first time since World War II the international community is united. The leadership of the United Nations, once only a hoped-for ideal, is now confirming its founders’ vision. ... The world can therefore seize this opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order …”25 The war certainly moved the world in that direction. Under his son, a third-generation Skull-and-Bones-man, the Muslim nations have been rapidly moved towards World War III. A few days after 9/11, Canadian Prime Minister Chrétien remarked in New York: “There will probably be a new order in the world that will probably be better than we have now.”26 Indeed, given the many countries waging war in the Middle East, it seems we are already in an undeclared World War.
As for North America, Canadian Naval Commander William Carr, a geopolitical expert, said around 1957:
- “We will know the hour for subjugation has arrived when
the President of the U.S.A. and the Prime Minister in Canada declare
a State of Emergency and set up a military dictatorship
on the pretense that such action is necessary to protect the people
from Communist aggression. The Communist Parties in both our countries
are being ‘contained’ because the Illuminati intend
to use them to bring about ‘The State of Emergency.’ …
- “When the Communists are ordered to revolt they will
be allowed to run wild as they were in Russia. ... Then the agent[s]
of the Illuminati will appear ... and take over control under the
pretense they are the saviors of the people.”27
Are Muslim terrorists today — real or pretend — being used as the advance guard of the Communists? Militarization of the American side of the border has already started as insurance against unspecified future terrorist incursions from Canada.
Now let’s look at the founding of the UN and its role in the Masonic plan. President Woodrow Wilson’s closest advisor was Edward Mandell House, an Illuminati agent. The U.S. was dragged into World War I through a secret agreement of House, and the provocation was the deliberate betrayal of the British ocean liner Lusitania, with Americans on board, to German U-boat destruction. At the end of the war, House got Wilson to propose Fichte’s idea: a League of Nations for world peace. The League was partly funded by the Rockefellers and was a first step towards establishing the infrastructure of the world government. House, Wilson and the Rockefellers were all associated with Skull and Bones.28
The United States didn’t join the League, and so in 1921 the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was founded by internationalist bankers associated with Skull and Bones to lobby for American participation. Illuminati agent House was a founding member of the CFR, whose original membership was full of Bolshevik supporters. The CFR persuaded Britain and the U.S. to accept the Soviet regime.29
This union of financiers and Communists illustrates that Communism and capitalism are not opposed. Similarly, Left and Right mean nothing to Masons. Communism and Fascism are systems of absolute State power, descended from Hegel, so Masonic international bankers happily use totalitarian régimes to facilitate their goals.30
The CFR finally got the U.S. to participate in world government through World War II. By then the group controlled the State Department. Two weeks after Pearl Harbor, which led America to war, the Secretary of State recommended to President Franklin D. Roosevelt that the planning committee of the United Nations be formed. It was stacked with CFR members. It was thus the Communist-dominated Council on Foreign Relations, tied to the Order, that founded the United Nations in 1945. The UN wasn’t founded as a result of the war, but the war was used as a front for its founding — supposedly to prevent further wars, but actually to produce world government through war. CFR propaganda proceeded to promote the UN, conditioning the public to accept world government.31
Roosevelt, a 33° Mason and “close associate of the CFR,”32 wanted to join Stalin in the war, but several American bishops spoke out against it. They knew if the Allies won, it would strengthen Communist expansion. They were obeying Pius XI, who taught in Divini Redemptoris: “Communism is intrinsically perverse, and no one who would save Christian civilization may collaborate with it in any undertaking whatsoever.”33 It made no sense to cooperate with the Church’s enemy in order to preserve Christian civilization.
However, Cardinal Spellman, Roosevelt and the Vatican’s undersecretary for ordinary affairs, Monsignor Montini — the future Paul VI — pressured Pius XII to authorize a “wider interpretation of Divini Redemptoris.” On September 20, 1941, Pius XII “lifted all objections ... against American aid to Russia.” Catholics could now support Roosevelt and Stalin.34 The stage was set for the planned conflict between Fascism and Communism.
Next, like World War I, an excuse was needed for the U.S. to enter World War II. On December 7th, two-and-a-half months later, Pearl Harbor was bombed. Three naval admirals and others have described how high government officials, including Churchill and Roosevelt, provoked the Japanese attack, knew when it was coming, and did nothing to prevent it.35
The establishment of world government depends on the cooperation of both the United States and the Catholic Church with Communism. In September 1942, Pius XII said, “At the request of President Roosevelt, the Vatican has refrained from all polemics against the Communist régime .... May God grant that the free world may not have to regret my silence one day!” Later, the Pope spoke out against Communism, but his permission to cooperate with Stalin, and his silence, had opened the door to Communist penetration of the Church, either directly or through the UN.36
Unfortunately, Pius also committed the Church to support decolonization,37 which was vital to Moscow’s plans of worldwide expansion. In 1920, Stalin had called for the secession of India, Arabia and other colonized countries, “because secession ... would mean ... a weakening of the position of imperialism and a strengthening of the position of the revolution”.38 The Good Friday prayers for the Holy Roman Emperor, which Pius XII removed, were prayers for the civilizing expansion of Christianity. This action now became excoriated as the crime of “colonialism”.39 John XXIII completed the Church’s disavowal of colonialism in Pacem in Terris.40
The Vatican ignored the savage nature of decolonization, in which the UN aided Russia. The UN’s so-called peace-keeping actions destroyed Christian European colonies in Africa and turned the territories over to the Communists. “The UN opens the doors to Communism” was a common saying in the Congo.41 A Communist pamphlet titled The United Nations and printed in India, explained, “The UN will be an extremely helpful instrument in breaking up the colonial territories of non-Communist countries” and “will eventually bring about the amalgamation of all nations into a single Soviet system.”42 In 1962, the Vatican-Moscow Agreement on Catholic silence regarding Communism ensured the expansion of the satanic new world order.
A former member of the United States Communist Party has testified that the UN’s “Kremlin masterminds ... never intended the UN as a peace-keeping organization.” He said it has been Communist-designed “for sociological conquest”; it’s a “Trojan horse” whose aim is “Communist penetration of the West.”43 In fact, the UN “blueprint” was drawn up by Lenin, expanded by Stalin and refined by Khrushchev.44
Communists have openly asserted that the UN is “one of the most important platforms for Soviet propaganda” from which “they may preach to the populations of the entire world” “over the heads of their governments”. The Soviets insisted that UN headquarters should be in the United States. From here their spies, posing as delegates or staff, could use their diplomatic immunity to infiltrate American society. J. Edgar Hoover, former head of the FBI, “stated that Communist diplomats assigned to the United Nations ‘represent the backbone of Russian intelligence operations in this country’.”45
A former leader of the United States Communist Party acknowledged that American Communists, many of whom were government figures, also had a major hand in the planning and creation of the UN.46 The chairman of a Senate investigation committee stated: “... there is today in the UN among the American employees there, the greatest concentration of Communists that this Committee has ever encountered ... These people occupy high positions ... almost all ... have ... been employees in the U.S. government in high and sensitive positions.” The committee believed the government knew they were Communists, and deliberately transferred them to the UN.47 The first members in any organization are the ones who get it operating according to the principles upon which it is being founded;48 hence careful planning went into setting the United Nations firmly on the path of establishing the totalitarian Masonic empire once and for all.
Alger Hiss, a known Soviet spy and member of the Council on Foreign Relations, was an advisor to Roosevelt. He was also the Secretary-General of the founding UN conference at San Francisco, and helped write the UN Charter.49 Another known key agent was Harry Dexter White, assistant secretary of the Treasury Department. With Mason Harry Truman’s support, he helped establish the United Nations International Monetary Fund.50 The IMF is the “framework for a [global] bank of issue” of a world currency, which will result in world government. The IMF and its sister UN agency, the World Bank, are CFR, i.e., Illuminati, creations. Under the guise of humanitarian aid, the World Bank loans mainly American tax dollars to spread socialism and Communism.51
All the UN Secretary-Generals have been anti-Christian and anti-West. They are citizens of the world, who place loyalty to all nations above loyalty to one’s own country. In 1952, U.S. News & World Report stated that “as many as one-half of the ... administrative executives in the UN are either Communists or people who are willing to do what they want.” In 1955, a former Communist involved in Communist political warfare in the U.S. publicly admitted, “... there can be no doubt that Communists control the UN ... and use it for all its worth; ... most of the [UN’s] special agencies ... are, in fact, operated by them.”52
How can one say that Communism is dead if the world’s governing authority is the personification of Communism? One just has to study the vast number of UN special agencies, like UNICEF, the World Health Organization and UNESCO; the treaties; the conventions that give family-destroying rights to children and feminists; the United Religions Organization (URO); and the so-called peace-keeping actions, to see that all these entities are completely Communistic in their goals and methodology.
Some quick examples:
- 1. The first head of the World Health Organization
called for “the eradication of the concept of right and wrong” in
the education of children in order to change human behavior.53
2. The United Religions Organization is the institution of the UN’s atheistic, occult one-world religion. It was co-founded by the Marxist Mikhail Gorbachev who wishes to reduce the population of the earth by 90%.54
3. UNESCO was founded on the vision of world government and eugenics.55 (I’ll come back to it later.)
Communism has “perpetrated more death and destruction than most of the wars of history combined.” Its policies have broken millions of families and destroyed homes and countries, and it continues unchecked in its path of carnage,56 wearing different costumes. By peace, the UN means the Communist peace in which all opposition is eliminated, as admitted by former UN Secretary General U Thant.57 Before its finalization, an American Senator had predicted: “[T]he adoption of the [UN] Charter ... will mean perpetuating war.”58 As George Orwell warned in his book 1984, we will all one day love Big Brother if we wish to live in peace. The slogan during this period, he noted, would be “War is Peace,” whilst the Ministry of Peace would concern itself with war.
Isn’t this exactly what we see today as international “peacekeeping” forces are waging war under the new job description of “peacemaking”? But the UN’s massive propaganda machine and media control prevent people from knowing the truth. In 1961, Adlai Stevenson, the American ambassador to the UN and head of the Council on Foreign Relations, instructed the UN press corps to lie and paint a flattering picture of UN intentions.59
Besides the god of peace, the god of human rights is also invoked to facilitate the United Nations’ agenda. The UN’s Declaration of Human Rights is accorded a higher status than the Ten Commandments. The Declaration was highly praised by Popes John XXIII60 and John Paul II61 although it’s descended from the Masonic French Revolution, says Hans Küng.62 There’s no right to life of unborn babies enshrined in the Declaration, but John XXIII gave a hint of why the Declaration is important. He said it “represents an important step on the path towards the juridical-political organization of all the peoples of the world.”63 That’s the point: the Declaration of Human Rights is the foundation of international laws for a world government that will be completely inimical to the rights of God and His Church. There’s no mention of God in any UN documents, and in the New York headquarters, there’s a huge statue of the ferocious Greek god Zeus.
The Declaration on Human Rights closely parallels the Soviet Constitution.64 It’s a blueprint for tyranny. The basic Marxist plank in the Declaration and the Soviet Constitution is that man’s “material well-being is all important; his privacy and freedom are secondary considerations.” So governments must take “full responsibility for the welfare of the people” and control “all their activities.”
A United Nations covenant is enforceable legislation once it is ratified, and it overrides a country’s constitution. Further, nearly every high-sounding phrase, such as the rights to privacy, freedom of expression or religion, can be legally denied by national governments or the UN if they believe it is “necessary to protect national security, ... public safety, ... the rights ... of others,” etc. The Masonic French Revolution was perpetrated in the name of public safety, and Hitler’s atrocities in the name of national security.65 Today democratic countries are rapidly losing their rights in the name of national security and public safety, thanks to the “war on terror.” And freedom of religion, such as freedom to protest same-sex marriage or sex education, is also being erased in the name of minority rights. So even if the Soviet Union has truly collapsed, Soviet Russia’s ideology lives on in the Human Rights and other UN documents. This is signified by the UN insignia, which was designed by an American Communist to resemble that of the Soviet Union.66
UN military interventions are carried out to supposedly defend human rights but the rights of governments are ignored where revolution has been fomented and the government fights back. The UN interferes, claiming it is putting an end to aggression. By its own definition, a United Nations military action is not aggression.67 UN and NATO actions against sovereign states that do not cooperate with the new world order are called “police action”68 or “Operation something” and are rationalized as “humanitarian” intervention after enough violent chaos has been fomented to hopefully justify genocidal international force, as in Kosovo, the Serbian province within Yugoslavia. Starting around 1998, the American CIA and the British Special Armed Services (agencies of NATO countries) armed and trained the Marxist Kosovo Liberation Army terrorists to foment armed rebellion. “After bombing Yugoslavia into submission in 1999, NATO then stood by and ... allowed the KLA” to “ethnically cleanse” the non-Albanians from Kosovo and form its new government. In 1993 the U.S. had classified the KLA as a terrorist organization financed by the heroin trade. The KLA was also known to be receiving money and training from Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, but after it started working for the U.S. in 1998, it was removed from its terrorist list.69
Now, NATO is actually a United Nations regional organization, meant to strengthen the UN and move us in the direction of One World. It’s a Communist ally and an agent of Communist expansion. Its anti-Communist stance during the Cold War was simply posturing. Stalin saw the necessity of regional groups as an intermediate stage to world government. He figured that people would transfer national loyalties more easily to a regional group than to a world authority. The regionals could later be combined into the world dictatorship. The Organization of American States and its African equivalent are also UN regional groups. In 1963, President Kennedy advocated global socialism and control through both the UN and NATO.70 Russia became a NATO partner in 2002 to fight the “common enemy” of global terrorism.71
Because China and Russia conveniently vetoed UN action in Kosovo, NATO set a new precedent of using the Declaration of Human Rights in order to avert “a humanitarian tragedy.” This precedent means that NATO — as an extension of the UN — will now intervene anywhere in the world.72 It’s now in Afghanistan, where the opium trade is thriving after the defeat of the anti-Communist Taliban. NATO member Turkey has been helping the KLA in Kosovo to supply arms and drugs, including opium from Afghanistan, to Europe through the Balkans. Serbian President Milosevic tried to stop the terrorists,73 so he was destroyed by NATO.
In the evolution of international law, the 1975 UN Covenant Against Torture overruled a signatory country’s domestic laws, forcing it to take action against foreigners for crimes allegedly committed in another country. Then a 1993 Belgian law successfully enabled an ordinary jury to prosecute and convict people accused of committing war crimes in another country. This is in keeping with the spirit of the Declaration of Human Rights: human rights supersede national sovereignty. In other words, Belgium set the precedent that an international court is not necessary to prosecute “crimes against humanity,” so that all nations now have universal jurisdiction and the right to supplant the legal system of other nations in which the torture allegedly occurred. Canada passed similar legislation in 2000.74
Spreading the Errors of Russia
All United Nations specialized agencies are working to strengthen the UN and spread its Marxist agenda into every sphere of life. People are won over by self-interest as the UN is painted as the big problem-solver and guarantor of an earthly paradise, the new world order.
Now let’s look briefly at UNESCO, the UN’s Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, whose constitution was written by a member of Skull and Bones.75 Mrs. Laura Bush praised UNESCO in 2003 for spreading the values that help defeat terrorism and generate peace.76 The Vatican has supported the organization since 1952. In 2002, Pope John Paul appealed to UNESCO to build bridges through dialogue and “the formation of consciences” to avoid wars.77
But UNESCO spreads the errors of Russia through education and culture. Communists themselves have explained that “UNESCO corresponds to the agitation and propaganda department in the Communist party.... getting at the public mind, young and old.”78 UNESCO is at the forefront of the environmental movement and, of course, is anti-life. It’s also highly involved in establishing the occult one-world culture and religion.79 It has also been working for the Jewish agenda of revising Christian teaching, “particularly the story of the Crucifixion,” so as to “reduce the danger of implanting anti-Semitism in the minds of the young.” In the 1950s it was praised by the American Jewish Committee for “revis[ing] textbooks originally prejudicial to one or another racial, religious, or ethnic group.”80 Interestingly, Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion was reported in Time magazine of August 16, 1948, as saying, “We consider that the United Nations ideal is a Jewish ideal.”
Another danger for the Church is UNESCO’s World Heritage Convention, which is a blatant property grab. Through this Convention, the Church is losing control of her physical and cultural heritage — her ancient churches, artwork and so on. The Convention postulates that there are some natural and man-made sites which are not the national heritage of a particular country, but of the world, because they have “universal value.” They belong to the world.
World Heritage sites include natural wonders like the Grand Canyon; sites of pagan rites like Stonehenge; monuments, ancient temples and Catholic churches like Chartres Cathedral; and even Auschwitz Concentration Camp. These sites allegedly further “universal ideas” that unite people. For instance, they might exemplify evolution or a past way of life of some culture. In other words, they promote the pantheistic one-world culture.
The World Heritage Convention stipulates that the protection of these sites is the responsibility of all mankind. Countries that ratify the Convention “pledge to conserve” these sites “for future generations.” In return, “the international community helps them to protect these marvels,” i.e., the UN controls how the site is used. Signatories contribute an obligatory amount to the World Heritage Fund. The Holy See signed on October 7, 1982,81 turning over the entire site of the Vatican to UNESCO control. That means that everything on Vatican property must operate according to UNESCO’s rules for opening, closing, maintenance, renovation, etc.
Now, atheistic Communism is actually pantheism, as it “subordinates the individual to the collective” and “denies the existence of God ... by identifying Him with the universe.” In pantheism and collectivism the individual and private property are absorbed in the collective. Pantheism and collectivism are the two prongs of Illuminism and Communism.82 So the spread of pantheism in the Church through movements for ecumenism, syncretism and universal brotherhood, is the spread of Communism and Masonry. Cardinal Newman warned of “the spread of pantheism ... the great deceit which awaits the age to come,”83 i.e., our times. Sister Lucy observed we are living in a time of diabolical disorientation — literally, confusion coming from the devil — and warned us not to be deceived.84
The League of Nations was associated with occult Russian Theosophy,85 a branch of Masonry whose pantheistic occultism is the foundation of the one-world religion. The League’s successor, the United Nations, is uniting the world’s religions into this one-world religion. For all its talk on religious freedom, the UN intends everyone to practice its occult spirituality, and they will be monitored for compliance.86 The syncretic services held everywhere today, with government officials involved, are the liturgical rites of the pantheistic one-world religion that is nothing else than the worship of Satan. Separation of Church and State no longer applies when the Church is Masonry.
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child makes it an offense for parents to teach their children reverence for their religion as this fosters “religious discrimination.”87 And parents can’t object to multicultural indoctrination of children even in Catholic schools as this could be interpreted as child abuse under Article 14, which guarantees religious freedom for children.
Feminism is yet another error of Russia. Most of its tenets are derived from Communism and the Soviet State. So the UN has long promoted women’s rights, which are destructive of the family, the Faith and Christian morality.
This talk has only touched the surface of how the United Nations is spreading all the errors of Russia. Our Lady of Fatima said Russia is God’s chosen instrument of chastisement for the world and the Church. The UN has every nation and even the Catholic Church under its control to some degree. Once disarmament is complete and all militaries and weapons are under UN control, it will be a full dictatorship. President Kennedy said disarmament would create “a radically new international system; ... [it] would encourage nations to give up much of their ... sovereignty.” Their national security would depend “on an international peace force under an immensely ... strengthened United Nations.”88 Notice how all the recent wars, right up to the latest Israeli-Lebanese one, produced a desperate call for UN peacekeepers. And the UN is strengthened as the fighting forces of more and more countries come under its control, shifting their loyalties from their nation to the world.
By the way, there’s a group called the World Constitution and Parliament Association that may take over from the United Nations. It may first require the third world war, but it will only be a change of names, much like the switchover from the League of Nations.89 So we should not be fooled if one day the UN is said to have “collapsed.”
The propaganda that Communism is dead is the greatest deception ever foisted on a world desperate for peace. It is a deception that comes directly from the devil — a diabolical disorientation. In these times of diabolical disorientation, said Sr. Lucy, “the devil has succeeded in infiltrating evil under cover of good.” Doesn’t that describe the UN? She added, “[S]ouls are letting themselves be deceived …. We must defend souls against the errors which can make them stray from the good road.”90
The UN is keeping Communism alive. Pope Pius XI said we may not cooperate with Communism — and hence, the UN — in any way if we are to save Christian civilization and the social order. Sixty years after the United Nations was founded for peace, we live amongst the ruins of Christian civilization, facing a third world war and a slaughter that have been pre-planned for the establishment of the Kingdom of Satan on earth.
The Message of Fatima was clear: depend on God, not man, for peace; God has entrusted peace in our day only to Mary. Why? Perhaps because, as St. John Eudes taught, the hearts of Jesus and Mary are so united they can be considered as one heart. Hence, the triumph of the Immaculate Heart automatically means the restoration of the Kingship of Christ. And that means peace, as expressed in this traditional prayer: “Jesus, King and Center of all hearts, through the advent of Thy Kingdom, grant us peace.” That’s why the devil has worked against the Consecration of Russia for seventy-seven years!
That’s why, implying the diabolical disorientation would greatly affect the ministers of the Church, Sister Lucy exclaimed: “Gladly I sacrifice myself and offer my life to God for peace in His Church, for priests and for all consecrated souls, especially for those who are so deceived and misled!”91
Can we, in charity, do any less than this messenger chosen by Heaven?
Notes:1.Father Brian Harrison, “The Pope’s Right Arm,” Christian Order, March 1994, p. 140. (All emphases added.)
2.Napoleon was an advanced Freemason: Monsignor George Dillon, Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked (1885; reprint, 1950), p. 35.
3.Father Harrison, ibid.
4.This State would have included Austria and Catholic parts of western Germany and was to be led by Archduke Otto, heir to the Hapsburg throne in Austria: Joan Gralla, “Pius XII Sought Germanic Post-war Catholic State,” The Toronto Star, November 9, 2000, p. A14.
5.Sister Lucia, Fatima in Lucia’s Own Words, ed. Father Louis Kondor, SVD, trans. Dominican Nuns of Perpetual Rosary (Fatima: Postulation Centre, 1976), p. 167. The edition cited is the one without photographs.
6.Cf. Pope Pius XII, “The Christian and the World Community,” address to the Pax Romana assembly, Rome, April 25, 1957.
7.Emery Kelen, Hammarskjöld (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1966), p. 109.
8.“Pope John Paul I,” praiseofglory.com/popejp1.htm.
9.“U.N. is More Necessary Than Ever to Reconstruct Countries, Pope Says,” Zenit.org, May 15, 2003.
10.“An Ever Timely Commitment: Teaching Peace,” Message for the World Day of Peace, posted at www.vatican.va, nos. 5-7, 9.
11.William Guy Carr, The Conspiracy to Destroy all Existing Governments and Religions (n.p., U.S.A.: ca. 1960), pp. 2-3, 15.
12.Father Clarence Kelly, Conspiracy Against God and Man (Belmont, Mass.: Western Islands, 1974), pp. 4-7.
13.Carr, p. 8.
14.Kathleen R. Hayes, “The Illuminati Follows its Satanic Blueprint,” NRI Trumpet (Aurora, Col.), October 1988, p. 3; Antony C. Sutton, America’s Secret Establishment (Billings, Mont.: Liberty House Press, 1986), pp. 34, 104.
15.Father Kelly, p. 4.
16.Cornelia R. Ferreira, The New Age Movement: The Kingdom of Satan on Earth (Scarborough, Ont.: Canisius Books, 1991), pp. 11-12.
17.Sutton, pp. 34-35.
18.Hayes, ibid.; Carr, pp. 14, 16.
19.Sutton, pp. 34, 118-19.
20.Carr, p. 11.
21.Hayes, ibid.; Carr, 2-3, 9, 16.
22.Sutton, 23, 126, 138-41, 148-75.
23.Ibid., 22, 38, 169-70, 178, 180; “My Heritage is Part of Who I Am,” Time, August 7, 2000, p. 42.
24.Ibid., pp. 26, 104. Note that the Order-influenced group that gave birth to the League of Nations was named the League to Enforce Peace, which is precisely the job description of the United Nations.
25. State of the Union address, January 30, 1991. (Emphasis added.)
26.Tim Harper, “Sombre Chrétien Tours New York’s Ground Zero,” Toronto Star, September 30, 2001, p. A1.
27.Carr, p. 19.
28.Gary H. Kah, En Route to Global Occupation (Lafayette, LA: Huntington House Publishers, 1991), p. 29; Sutton, pp. 96, 107; James Perloff, The Shadows of Power (Appleton, WI: Western Islands, 1988), pp. 27-32.
29.Kah, pp. 29-31; Perloff, pp. 36-42, 58.
30 Cf. Perloff, pp. 42-52.
31.Ibid., pp. 71-72; Kah, pp. 36-37.
32.Kah, p. 34.
33.Pope Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris On Atheistic Communism, March 19, 1937, n. 58.
34.Frère Michel de la Sainte Trinité, The Whole Truth About Fatima, trans. John Collorafi, vol. III: The Third Secret: 1942-1960 (Buffalo, New York: Immaculate Heart Publications, 1990), pp. 134-38, 211.
35.Ibid., p. 211; G. Edward Griffin, The Fearful Master: A Second Look at the United Nations (Belmont, Mass.: Western Islands, 1964), p. 233; Perloff, pp. 65-69, 75; Dennis Laurence Cuddy, Secret Records Revealed, 2d ed., (Oklahoma City: Hearthstone Publishing, 1999), pp. 60-61.
36.Frère Michel, pp. 149, 212, 218-19, 450, 453-54.
37.Ibid., pp. 446-53.
38.Griffin, p. 9.
39.Father Harrison, ibid.
40.Cf. Pope John XXIII, Pacem in Terris Peace on Earth, April 11, 1963, nos. 42-43.
41.Griffin, p. 29.
42.Ibid., p. 71.
43.Ibid., pp. 119-20.
44.Ibid., p. 68.
45.Ibid., pp. 72-73, 82-84.
46.Ibid., pp. 70, 87.
47.Ibid., pp. 96-98.
48.Cf. Sutton, p. 27.
49.Griffin, pp. 87-91; Kah, p. 37.
50.Griffin, pp. 90-91; Kah, p. 54.
51.Perloff, pp. 72-74. Perloff documents the comment made by Federal Reserve Board governor Mariner Eccles at the IMF founding: “An international currency is synonymous with international government.” (Emphasis added.)
52.Griffin, pp. 109-19.
53.Dennis L. Cuddy, “Big Boost in U.N. Pay,” The News & Observer (Raleigh, N. Carolina), July 25, 1997, p. 18A.
54.Cornelia R. Ferreira, “One-World Church Expected Next Year,” Catholic Family News, October 1996, p. 1; John Henry Westen, “World’s Elite Gather to Talk Depopulation,” The Interim (Toronto), April 1996, p. 6.
56.Cf. Griffin, pp. 210, 224.
57.He stated that Lenin’s “ideals of peace and peaceful co-existence … are in line with the aims of the UN charter”: John F. McManus, “Reagan Wrong About UN,” The Birch Log (Belmont, Mass.), October 9, 1986; Kah, p. 37.
58.Griffin, p. 158.
59.Ibid., pp. 157-60.
60.Pacem in Terris, n. 143.
61.Who called it “one of the highest expressions of the human conscience of our time” in his address to the 50th General Assembly of the United Nations, October 5, 1995, n. 2.
62.Hans Küng, “Global Ethic and Human Responsibilities,” speech to the Symposium on Human Rights and Human Responsibilities, Santa Clara University, California, April 1, 2005, posted at scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/global_ethics/laughlin-lectures/global-ethic-human-responsibility.html.
63.Pacem, n. 144.
64.Griffin, pp. 126-27.
65.Ibid., pp. 124-29, 132. As early as 1949, it became obvious that, contravening its own Charter, the UN considers nothing to be just the internal or domestic affair of a nation; everything is international and subject to UN jurisdiction. Presidents Truman and Eisenhower publicly acknowledged there was no longer any difference between domestic and foreign affairs (pp. 185-87). The reasons proffered for the two wars against Iraq are working examples of this UN policy.
66. Griffin, p. 162.
67.Ibid., pp. 134-35. Griffin documents in great detail the bloody United Nations atrocities that helped turn the Belgian Congo over to Communist revolutionaries in the 1960s.
68. Ibid., pp. 57, 193. Note that the UN Charter authorizes heads of government to act unilaterally, i.e., like dictators, able to send troops to war without seeking the approval of their country’s governing body (pp. 189-95).
69.Marcus Gee, “Arming KLA Scares the West,” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), April 13, 1999, p. A18; James Bissett, “We Created a Monster,” ibid., July 31, 2001, p. A13; Chris Hedges, “Chaos allows KLA Fighters to Take Power in Kosovo,” ibid., July 29, 1999, p. A1; “Ask the Globe,” November 19, 2001, p. A5.
70.Griffin, pp. 68, 201-2; Perloff, pp. 84-86.
71. Robert MacPherson, “NATO, Russia Upgrade Ties at Italy Summit,” The Baltic Times, May 30, 2002.
72.Paul Koring, “Will Fight for ‘Just’ Cause, Eggleton Says,” Globe and Mail, October 2, 1999, p. A21.
73.Sunil Ram, “NATO in Bed with a Scorpion,” ibid., August 8, 2000, p. A13.
74.“The Pinochet Precedent,” ibid., March 25, 1999, p. A14; “The Case Against General Pinochet,” ibid., September 30, 1999, p. A16; “Tried or Not, Pinochet Can’t Erase the Precedent,” ibid., January 13, 2000, p. A16; Stephanie Nolan, “Rwandans’ Sentencing ‘Huge’ Win, Activists Say,” ibid., June 9, 2001, p. A10. The International Court of Justice later ruled that Belgium cannot try world leaders for war crimes: “Belgium Told it Can’t Try World Leaders, Envoys,” ibid., February 15, 2002, p. A18. In 1993, Belgium limited its law to cases involving only Belgians and exempted citizens of democratic nations from Belgian prosecution: “Amid American Threats, Belgium Agrees to Limit Reach of War Crimes Law,” Associated Press, posted at hispeed.rogers.com, June 22, 2003. In his speech of January 1, 2004, Pope John Paul II called for the strengthening of international law with sanctions even for “government leaders who violate … human dignity and rights while hiding behind the unacceptable pretext that it is a matter of questions internal to their State” (n. 9). But since abortion, birth control and homosexuality are now human rights, a future Pope could feel the weight of strengthened international laws.
75.Sutton, p. 97.
76.“Laura Bush is Picture Perfect,” Globe and Mail, September 30, 2003, p. A19.
77.“Pope Appeals to UNESCO to Build Bridges of Dialogue to Avoid Wars,” Zenit.org, December 11, 2002.
78.Griffin, p. 141.
79. Cornelia R. Ferreira, “On Recognizing and Overcoming the New Age Infiltration of the Church,” Catholic Family News, February 1998, p. 1.
80.“Quotations From The American Jewish Yearbook,” American Mercury (New York), February 1959, p. 103.
81.“The World Heritage,” World Heritage Sites map and information issued by UNESCO, 1992.
82.Father Kelly, pp. 178-81, 195.
83. Tract Eighty-Five (1838), cited in Laurene K. Conner, “The New Age Movement…,” The Wanderer Forum Quarterly, October 1991, p. 21.
84. Frère Michel, pp. 752-55, 760-61.
85.Maria Carlson, “No Religion Higher Than Truth”: A History of the Theosophical Movement in Russia, 1875-1922 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), p. 182.
86 Robert Muller, “The State of the World in Earth Day 2013,” in Robert Muller, Framework for Preparation for the Year 2000, the 21st Century and the Third Millennium, ed. David H. Darst (Wallingford, CT: The Albert Schweitzer/Quinnipiac College Press, 1994), p. 24.
87.Griffin, p. 135.
88.Ibid., pp. 217-18.
89.Kah, p. 176.
90. Frère Michel, pp. 758-59. (Emphasis added.) These words of Sr. Lucy in 1970 and 1971 are, to all intents and purposes, identical to those of Pius XII in his speech warning about Communist action within the Church, given on January 21, 1945 (pp. 218-19): the “methods of war” used by “the enemies of the Church,” who “pretend to have good intentions,” include “the unconscious contribution of numerous misled minds, which allow themselves to be led astray by them and led away from the good road.”
91. Ibid., pp. 757-58.
Video | Transcripts| Sites |Topics | Speakers | Home